On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 07:50:48PM +0900, Nanako Shiraishi wrote: > Quoting Matthew Ogilvie <mmogilvi_git@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > The reverse reference has long existed, and the autocrlf description > > was actually obsolete and wrong (saying only file content is used), > > not just incomplete. > > What do you mean by "reverse reference"? > I'm refering to the fact that the "crlf" section of Documentation/gitattributes.txt mentions core.autocrlf, which is in the opposite (reverse) direction as this new reference I'm adding. The crlf section has a much more thorough description of the various knobs and settings and how they interact. But I just checked, and although the gitattributes crlf section describes core.autocrlf in reasonable detail, it does not have an actual link (reference?) to git-config or the core.autocrlf section. So the commit message isn't as clear as it could be. Do I need to resubmit the patch, in order to rephrase the commit message? -- Matthew Ogilvie [mmogilvi_git@xxxxxxxxxxxx] -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html