Re: Preserving branches after merging on ancestor

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 8:51 PM, rhlee <richard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi John, Björn and Eric,
>
> Thank you very much for your replies from which I gained a lot insight about
> git merging and different workflows.
>
> Yes, I have tried out --no-ff and it does the job for me. (Incidentally, doing
> that take it look neater in git gui as all the master nodes appear on top of
> each other. Using empty commits, the merged branches appear on top the master
> nodes in the graph.)

Thanks to Richard, John, Björn, and Eric.

I had a similar _confusion_ looking looking at graph. I always use "log --graph
--pretty=oneline". Now I have _opted_ to pull/merge with '--no-ff', to keep the
graph plain and simple for non-power users :)



-- Dilip
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]