Heya, On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 21:16, Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > If we change the ls-remote.c case, it becomes impossible for a struct > transport to ever have a NULL remote field. And the change to ls-remote > removes a special case. I'd go so far as to say that ls-remote.c should > provide a struct remote, and transport_get should enforce that there's a > struct remote. If that is the case (that we can eliminate the only special case), I agree that we should fix it there, where it will be the least effort. I got the impression from Junio's original post that there are multiple places that would have to be fixed, and I figured that we should fix it where it will be the least amount of effort :). -- Cheers, Sverre Rabbelier -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html