Re: merge confusion

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 13:01, Tim Mazid <timmazid@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> You can just do a 'git branch branch-to-merge COMMIT' then 'git merge
> branch-to-merge' from your feature branch. Alternatively, you could just do
> a straight 'git merge COMMIT' from your feature branch. Though I'm not sure
> of the consequences of merging a commit instead of a branch.

The only consequence is that the merge commit message (if there will be any,
fast-forward merges don't merge anything) will mention the SHA1 instead of
branch name. You can provide your own merge commit message, of course
(while merging and afterwards).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]