merge confusion

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I had some unexpected behaviour doing a merge today. I wonder if anybody can
tell me where I have gone wrong. This is the sequence...

* clone a remote repo
* created a local branch to track one of the remote branches
* did work on the local branch and then created another 'feature' branch
from that
* time elapsed and at some point(s) I pulled from the remote but did not
merge the original local branch
* finished feature, checkout local branch and merge in feature. 

What I didn't expect is that all the subsequent changes on the tracked
remote branch got merged in too. Which I didn't want.

So the question is - is that what's supposed to happen (ie. if you do any
merge the tracked branch 'fast forwards' the remote) and, if so, if I want a
branch that stays a branch (doesn't ever merge with the remote) how would I
do that?

Thanks!
-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/merge-confusion-tp24755682p24755682.html
Sent from the git mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]