Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes: > Hi, > > On Tue, 20 Oct 2009, Alex Riesen wrote: > >> On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 08:45, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >>> It probably is also a good idea to add a "--loose" option that does what >> >>> "fsck" currently does without "--full". It is a good name >> >> --no-full works > > It works. Technically. For human users, though, --loose-objects-only > (with a shortcut "--loose") would be better. OTOH, the advantage of "--no-full" is that it's compatible with existing Git versions. If I learn Git 1.6.6 with --no-full, and use it in a script, then my stript works also with older Gits. But anyway, I think very few people are actually interested in "git --no-full" (or call it whatever you like), so I don't think this is very important. -- Matthieu Moy http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html