Re: git fsck not identifying corrupted packs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> Linus and other git developers from the early days [...]
>
> Thanks for the historical background.
>
>> It probably makes sense to ship 1.7.0 with a version of "fsck" in which
>> "--full" is the default; it would still accept "--full" but it would be a
>> no-op.
>
> +1
>
>> It probably is also a good idea to add a "--loose" option that does what
>> "fsck" currently does without "--full".  It is a good name
>
> +1 too.

Actually, I changed my mind.  I do not think this so big that we need to
wait for a major version bump.  Why not shoot for 1.6.6?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]