Re: [PATCH 2/3] DWIM "git checkout frotz" to "git checkout -b frotz origin/frotz"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Quoting Björn Steinbrink <B.Steinbrink@xxxxxx> writes:

> On 2009.10.18 19:34:48 +0900, Nanako Shiraishi wrote:
>> Quoting Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx>
>> 
>> > When 'frotz' is not a valid object name nor a tracked filename,
>> > we used to complain and failed this command.  When there is only
>> > one remote that has 'frotz' as one of its tracking branches, we can
>> > DWIM it as a request to create a local branch 'frotz' forking from
>> > the matching remote tracking branch.
>> 
>> In the subject you used 'git checkout -b frotz origin/frotz'. Did you
>> forget to say '-t'?
>
> Hm, the DWIMmery only triggers when opts.track is
> BRANCH_TRACK_UNSPECIFIED, i.e. -t was not used. And it doesn't change
> opts.track when it DWIMs, so it respects branch.autosetupmerge, which
> would be overriden by -t. So it seems correct that -t is not in there.

I see.

A user who always wants tracking can set the config option and use 
the new "git checkout frotz" shortcut, but a user who usually 
doesn't want tracking doesn't have the config option and when he 
wants tracking only for this new branch he can explicitly say "git 
checkout -t origin/frotz", right?

-- 
Nanako Shiraishi
http://ivory.ap.teacup.com/nanako3/

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]