Re: [PATCH/RFC] builtin-checkout: suggest creating local branch when appropriate to do so

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes:

> Actually, we should really think long and hard why we should not 
> automatically check out the local branch "next" in that case.

While people were thinking long and hard, I've spent some quality time
having fun with these patches, and realized that if we limit the scope of
the change to make sure that we only change the behaviour of a case where
we refused to do anything, this is not even something we need to think
long nor hard after all.

At least from the maintainer's point of view, that is.

I on the other hand do agree that we need to think long and hard when it
comes to the matter of explaining this to the users, though.  I couldn't
come up with a good (re-)ordering of the documentation to fit this new
"short-cut" into the manpage.

A three-patch series will follow shortly.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]