> Because git doesn't care about timestamps. It stores them as comments > (albeit auto-formatted comments) and relies on the dependency chain to > provide history. Ok, the word "history" in the context of git primarily means the order of changes not the when? Would it be a conceptual or technical issue for git to directly track the local time of merges/changesets? -Matt __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html