Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Wed, 27 Sep 2006, Matthew L Foster wrote: > > > > Perhaps git should record three(+) timestamps, adding when the change was committed into this > > repository? > > What you CAN do is to connect (in any particular private repository) a > _branch_update_ with the time it was done. That is Shawn Pierces "reflog" > work - you can track a particular branch _locally_. It's purely local to > that _one_ repository, though. It by definition makes no sense anywhere > else, and it's not tracking commits, it's literally tracking how branches > changed in a local copy. Well, I would simply look at the filesystem's mtime of the commit object resp. the pack containing the commit. IMHO good enough most of the time. Ciao, ET. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html