On Thursday 17 September 2009, Julian Phillips wrote: > On Thu, 17 Sep 2009, Julian Phillips wrote: > > On Wed, 16 Sep 2009, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> I am just curious. How would a "just one item lookbehind" code > >> perform compared to this one? > > > > The code you wrote ealier is almost the same as the string_list > > version, ~ 4.3s, so very marginally slower but a lot less code change. > > Personally I'd be happy with any of the three, so long as I don't have > > to wait 30s to find out that nothing's happened at $dayjob anymore ;) > > FWIW: I've Just modified my v2 patch to make use of the requirement that > the peeled ref immediately follow the base ref, and it's now ~4.1s and > should use less memory than the original too. I won't bother posting it > unless someone thinks it worth it though. It's worth it. :) ...Johan -- Johan Herland, <johan@xxxxxxxxxxx> www.herland.net -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html