On Thu, 17 Sep 2009, Julian Phillips wrote:
On Wed, 16 Sep 2009, Junio C Hamano wrote:
I am just curious. How would a "just one item lookbehind" code perform
compared to this one?
The code you wrote ealier is almost the same as the string_list version,
~ 4.3s, so very marginally slower but a lot less code change. Personally
I'd be happy with any of the three, so long as I don't have to wait 30s to
find out that nothing's happened at $dayjob anymore ;)
FWIW: I've Just modified my v2 patch to make use of the requirement that
the peeled ref immediately follow the base ref, and it's now ~4.1s and
should use less memory than the original too. I won't bother posting it
unless someone thinks it worth it though.
--
Julian
---
Taxes, n.:
Of life's two certainties, the only one for which you can get
an extension.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html