Re: [PATCH] graph API: fix bug in graph_is_interesting()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Previously, graph_is_interesting() did not behave quite the same way as
the code in get_revision().  As a result, it would sometimes think
commits were uninteresting, even though get_revision() would return
them.  This resulted in incorrect lines in the graph output.

This change creates a get_commit_action() function, which
graph_is_interesting() and simplify_commit() both now use to determine
if a commit will be shown.  It is identical to the old simplify_commit()
behavior, except that it never calls rewrite_parents().

This problem was reported by Santi Béjar.  The following command
would exhibit the problem before, but now works correctly:

  git log --graph --simplify-by-decoration --oneline v1.6.3.3

Previously git graph did not display the output for this command
correctly between f29ac4f and 66996ec, among other places.

Signed-off-by: Adam Simpkins <simpkins@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 graph.c    |    5 +++--
 revision.c |   15 ++++++++++++---
 revision.h |    1 +
 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/graph.c b/graph.c
index e466770..9087f65 100644
--- a/graph.c
+++ b/graph.c
@@ -286,9 +286,10 @@ static int graph_is_interesting(struct git_graph *graph, struct commit *commit)
 	}
 
 	/*
-	 * Uninteresting and pruned commits won't be printed
+	 * Otherwise, use get_commit_action() to see if this commit is
+	 * interesting
 	 */
-	return (commit->object.flags & (UNINTERESTING | TREESAME)) ? 0 : 1;
+	return get_commit_action(graph->revs, commit) == commit_show;
 }
 
 static struct commit_list *next_interesting_parent(struct git_graph *graph,
diff --git a/revision.c b/revision.c
index 8ffb661..fe7d522 100644
--- a/revision.c
+++ b/revision.c
@@ -1664,7 +1664,7 @@ static inline int want_ancestry(struct rev_info *revs)
 	return (revs->rewrite_parents || revs->children.name);
 }
 
-enum commit_action simplify_commit(struct rev_info *revs, struct commit *commit)
+enum commit_action get_commit_action(struct rev_info *revs, struct commit *commit)
 {
 	if (commit->object.flags & SHOWN)
 		return commit_ignore;
@@ -1692,12 +1692,21 @@ enum commit_action simplify_commit(struct rev_info *revs, struct commit *commit)
 			if (!commit->parents || !commit->parents->next)
 				return commit_ignore;
 		}
-		if (want_ancestry(revs) && rewrite_parents(revs, commit) < 0)
-			return commit_error;
 	}
 	return commit_show;
 }
 
+enum commit_action simplify_commit(struct rev_info *revs, struct commit *commit)
+{
+	enum commit_action action = get_commit_action(revs, commit);
+
+	if (action == commit_show && revs->prune && revs->dense && want_ancestry(revs)) {
+		if (rewrite_parents(revs, commit) < 0)
+			return commit_error;
+	}
+	return action;
+}
+
 static struct commit *get_revision_1(struct rev_info *revs)
 {
 	if (!revs->commits)
diff --git a/revision.h b/revision.h
index b10984b..9d0dddb 100644
--- a/revision.h
+++ b/revision.h
@@ -168,6 +168,7 @@ enum commit_action {
 	commit_error
 };
 
+extern enum commit_action get_commit_action(struct rev_info *revs, struct commit *commit);
 extern enum commit_action simplify_commit(struct rev_info *revs, struct commit *commit);
 
 #endif
-- 
1.6.4.314.g0a482.dirty

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]