Re: [PATCH 08/11] Place __stdcall to correct position.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Tue, 18 Aug 2009, Frank Li wrote:

> > How about "... to the correct ..." and "MSVC requires _stdcall to be
> > between return value..." and "All Win32 API functions are declared with
> > the WINAPI attribute."?
> 
> WINAPI always like
> 
> BOOL WINAPI function_name(xxx);
> It compile fail if WINAPI BOOL function_name(xxx);

Oh, okay, so let's say

	Furthermore, Microsoft Visual C++ requires the order

		BOOL WINAPI function();

	instead of

		WINAPI BOOL function();

> >>  #if defined(__MINGW32__) || defined(_MSC_VER)
> >> -static __stdcall unsigned run_thread(void *data)
> >> +static unsigned __stdcall run_thread(void *data)
> >>  {
> >>       struct async *async = data;
> >>       return async->proc(async->fd_for_proc, async->data);
> >>  }
> >> -#endif
> >> +#endif /* __MINGW32__ || _MSC_VER */
> >
> > I do not think this is necessary.  There are only 5 lines wrapped into
> > those #ifdef guards, the developer should be able to see that far.
> >
> Do you means remove /* __MINGW32__ || _MSC_VER */?

I was talking about this change:

> -#endif
> +#endif /* __MINGW32__ || _MSC_VER */

which is IMHO distracting rather than helpful.

Ciao,
Dscho


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]