Re: git pull for update of netdev fails.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 23/09/06, Petr Baudis <pasky@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Dear diary, on Sat, Sep 23, 2006 at 06:00:35AM CEST, I got a letter
where Shawn Pearce <spearce@xxxxxxxxxxx> said that...
> I can see the same concept of ref history being useful even for
> core git-rebase and doing it this way would also give it to StGIT
> without Catalin needing to change code.

In my StGIT tree, I don't want to have arbitrary N-days cutoff point,
I want all the patches history preserved at least as long as I carry
the patch, because it's just as valuable as the "regular" project
history to me.

That's how it currently works (the top of the log is in
refs/patches/<branch>/<patch>.log). I gave up the idea of using
reflogs for patch history.

--
Catalin
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]