Re: git pull for update of netdev fails.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Wed, 20 Sep 2006, Petr Baudis wrote:

> Dear diary, on Wed, Sep 20, 2006 at 05:28:08PM CEST, I got a letter
> where Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxx> said that...
> > However, you can tell git that Jeff is being difficult by marking such 
> > branches individually as being rebased.
> 
> This is really a wrong way of describing the problem - I'd say that Git
> is being difficult here. The point is, the subsystem maintainers need to
> maintain stacks of patches and rebase against the main kernel branch
> regularily, and they want to still publish their current state. So it's
> not really any of them being strange or difficult, but Git being so
> because it has no seamless support for tracking those branches.

So, what exactly do you propose? I do not see any way to help this 
problem, since you really throw away history. So, the 
git-is-being-difficult has to be taken with a pound of salt here.

Ciao,
Dscho

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]