Re: [PATCH 1/4] fast-import: put option parsing code in seperate functions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Aug 2009, Sverre Rabbelier wrote:
> 
> > +static void option_export_marks(const char *marks)
> > +{
> > +	struct strbuf buf = STRBUF_INIT;
> > +	strbuf_addstr(&buf, marks);
> > +	mark_file = strbuf_detach(&buf, NULL);
> > +}
> 
> Heh, this is a pretty convoluted way to write
> 
> 	mark_file = xstrdup(marks);
> 
> ;-)

Agreed.

> > +static void option_force()
> > +{
> > +	force_update = 1;
> > +}
> 
> I'm not sure that I would put these simple assignments in separate 
> functions, but that's certainly up to you!

Oh, good point.  Yes, please don't do that, please just write these
directly into the option parser.

Aside from these remarks, this patch looks good to me.

-- 
Shawn.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]