Alex Blewitt <alex.blewitt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > That patch was originally mailed on the 11th May. Has it taken until now > to notice the problem, or was the other method added in the last month or > so? If I'm to blame, I apologise but didn't note any compile time issues > at the time. Arrgh, you are right, I lost this patch in my inbox, and in the interm we applied new features to RevTag which added getName there. > On 10 Aug 2009, at 16:52, "Shawn O. Pearce" <spearce@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Obviously you didn't compile test this in JGit: Never mind. >> ./org/spearce/jgit/revwalk/RevTag.java:206: getName() in >> org.spearce.jgit.revwalk.RevTag cannot override getName() in >> org.spearce.jgit.lib.AnyObjectId; overridden method is final I can't apply this patch because getName() on RevTag is already defined with a different meaning. :-( -- Shawn. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html