Re: [PATCH 0/5] Suggested for PU: revision caching system to significantly speed up packing/walking

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Nick Edelen <sirnot@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> By the way, what would be the best way of posting a revised patchset?
> Should I just reply to my older posts, or make new ones?

That depends primarily on how heavily the patches needed to change in
response to review comments, but until the series lands in 'next', you
would typically send updated series as a replacement, not incremental.

Many people seemed to be interested in the series and had a volume of
comments on it.  I suspect the updated series would be quite different
from the original, so for the next round I would suspect it would be best
to start anew, marking them as [PATCH N/M (v2)], in a fresh thread.  It
would help reviewers if you said "this corresponds to [PATCH 3/5] in the
original series, with the following improvements based on X and Y's
comments" after the three-dash line.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]