Re: x86 SHA1: Faster than OpenSSL

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Artur Skawina wrote:
> 
> and my atom seems to like the compact loops too: 

no, that was wrong, i forgot to turn off the ondemand governor...

the unrolled loops are in fact much faster and the numbers
look more reasonable, after a few tweaks even on a P4.
Now i just need to check how well it does compared to the
asm implementations...

artur

#             TIME[s] SPEED[MB/s]
# ATOM
rfc3174         2.199       27.75
linus          0.8642       70.62
linusas         1.606       38.01
linusas2       0.8763       69.65
mozilla         2.813        21.7
mozillaas       2.539       24.04
# P4
rfc3174         1.402       43.53
linus          0.5835       104.6
linusas        0.4625         132
linusas2       0.4456         137
mozilla         1.529       39.91
mozillaas       1.131       53.96
# P3
rfc3174         5.019       12.16
linus            1.86       32.81
linusas         3.108       19.64
linusas2        1.812       33.68
mozilla         6.431        9.49
mozillaas       5.868        10.4


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]