The 28/07/09, Frans Pop wrote: > On Tuesday 28 July 2009, you wrote: > > Erik Faye-Lund wrote: > > > > Stricly speacking, it is not an invalid Message-Id. RFC 2822 says that > > the Message-Id has to be unique. The right hand side may not contain a > > domain identifier. It is a RECOMMENDED practice (a good one, though). > > It also says that (3.6.4): > The message identifier (msg-id) is similar in syntax to an angle-addr > construct without the internal CFWS. > > And defines: > message-id = "Message-ID:" msg-id CRLF > msg-id = [CFWS] "<" id-left "@" id-right ">" [CFWS] > > So, the domain part *is* required (or at least: there has to be a "@"; it > maybe does not require id-right to be an actual domain, but that's not > really relevant here). > > So, IMO inn2's check is correct. Hum, you're right. The '@' symbol is required, whatever "id-right" is. My previous patch should fix it. -- Nicolas Sebrecht -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html