Re: janitoring

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 03:00:21PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> 
>> > [PATCH 1/3] janitor: use NULL and not 0 for pointers.
>> >
>> >   I really dislike the use of 0 when NULL is meant. This patch probably
>> >   fixes most of them. The biggest culprit is nedmalloc, but a few
>> >   remnants exist in plain git code.
>> 
>> I am not enthused about "fixing" borrowed foreign code, unless we know
>> that we are committed to support our fork.  My impression was that this
>> ned stuff was borrowed by the MinGW folks with the understanding that we
>> will slurp it with minimum modification and turn a blind eye to its
>> sub-par coding styles, so that it can be more easily updated from the
>> upstream?
>
> Okay, maybe the 2-3 hunks that don't apply to nedmalloc stuff can be
> saved though, do you want me to send an updated patch ?

No, I'll split out that part and queue the rest.

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]