Re: janitoring

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 03:00:21PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > [PATCH 1/3] janitor: use NULL and not 0 for pointers.
> >
> >   I really dislike the use of 0 when NULL is meant. This patch probably
> >   fixes most of them. The biggest culprit is nedmalloc, but a few
> >   remnants exist in plain git code.
> 
> I am not enthused about "fixing" borrowed foreign code, unless we know
> that we are committed to support our fork.  My impression was that this
> ned stuff was borrowed by the MinGW folks with the understanding that we
> will slurp it with minimum modification and turn a blind eye to its
> sub-par coding styles, so that it can be more easily updated from the
> upstream?

Okay, maybe the 2-3 hunks that don't apply to nedmalloc stuff can be
saved though, do you want me to send an updated patch ?

-- 
Intersec <http://www.intersec.com>
Pierre Habouzit <pierre.habouzit@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Tél : +33 (0)1 5570 3346
Mob : +33 (0)6 1636 8131
Fax : +33 (0)1 5570 3332
37 Rue Pierre Lhomme
92400 Courbevoie

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]