Re: [PATCHv5 3/3] gitweb: gravatar url cache

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 12:02 AM, Junio C Hamano<gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Giuseppe Bilotta <giuseppe.bilotta@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> Views which contain many occurrences of the same email address (e.g.
>> shortlog view) benefit from not having to recalculate the MD5 of the
>> email address every time.
>> ---
>
> Sign-off?

Duh.

> I think the cache is placed at the wrong level (it doesn't have to be a
> GRavatar_url_cache, but can be a general avatar_url_cache).

I'm not sure about it. The URL depends on email and size (can you use
arrays as hash keys in Perl?) , and the email part might be the same
but the size part might differ across separate calls (in theory; in
practice avatars in a view are presently all the same size; but for
example if we were to autodetect email addresses in commit messages,
we might have both single- and double- sided avatars in the same
page). By hashing on email+size only we would lose the benefit of
cache when using the same avatar at separate sizes.

-- 
Giuseppe "Oblomov" Bilotta
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]