Re: [PATCH 2/2] rebase -i: use some kind of config file to save author information

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Sun, 21 Jun 2009, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > On Sat, 20 Jun 2009, Christian Couder wrote:
> >
> >> This is better than saving in a shell script, because it will make
> >> it much easier to port "rebase -i" to C. This also removes some sed
> >> regexps and some "eval"s.
> >
> > It will not make it easier to port "rebase -i" to C, as this is an 
> > internal file.  The user is not supposed to touch it at all.  Only "rebase 
> > -i".  So it would be very easy to just use a different on-disk format when 
> > turning "rebase -i" into a builtin.
> 
> "This is an internal file" is just a declaration you are making, and the
> file is observable by anybody after "rebase -i" relinquishes the control
> to let the user sort out the mess.

It is an observation I am making.  Sure, the file is observable by the 
user.  But it is hidden deep inside .git/ and users who change things 
inside .git/ (with the exception of config) are asking for trouble.

I really do not see the point of changing the file format _before_ turning 
rebase -i into C.

Oh, and I do not see the point of turning rebase -i into C before finally 
polishing sequencer so it can go into git.git's master.

Ciao,
Dscho
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]