man I can sure be blind at times... alright fixed the latter two
comments. I changed the test file because that particular test wanted
upload-pack to fail through the revision walker, which it could only
now do if shallow objects were involved.
@sam: oops, sorry about that.
From: Nick Edelen <sirnot@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [PATCH] Shift object enumeration out of upload-pack
Offload object enumeration in upload-pack to pack-objects, but fall
back on internal revision walker for shallow interaction. Test t5530
updated to reflect mechanism change.
Signed-off-by: Nick Edelen <sirnot@xxxxxxxxx>
---
t/t5530-upload-pack-error.sh | 2 +-
upload-pack.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/t/t5530-upload-pack-error.sh b/t/t5530-upload-pack-error.sh
index f5102b9..26bcd1e 100755
--- a/t/t5530-upload-pack-error.sh
+++ b/t/t5530-upload-pack-error.sh
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ test_expect_success 'fsck fails' '
test_expect_success 'upload-pack fails due to error in rev-list' '
! echo "0032want $(git rev-parse HEAD)
-00000009done
+0034shallow $(git rev-parse HEAD^)00000009done
0000" | git upload-pack . > /dev/null 2> output.err &&
grep "waitpid (async) failed" output.err
'
diff --git a/upload-pack.c b/upload-pack.c
index edc7861..397cada 100644
--- a/upload-pack.c
+++ b/upload-pack.c
@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ static unsigned long oldest_have;
static int multi_ack, nr_our_refs;
static int use_thin_pack, use_ofs_delta, use_include_tag;
static int no_progress;
+static int shallow_nr;
static struct object_array have_obj;
static struct object_array want_obj;
static unsigned int timeout;
@@ -107,8 +108,6 @@ static int do_rev_list(int fd, void *create_full_pack)
struct rev_info revs;
pack_pipe = fdopen(fd, "w");
- if (create_full_pack)
- use_thin_pack = 0; /* no point doing it */
init_revisions(&revs, NULL);
revs.tag_objects = 1;
revs.tree_objects = 1;
@@ -155,13 +154,21 @@ static void create_pack_file(void)
const char *argv[10];
int arg = 0;
- rev_list.proc = do_rev_list;
- /* .data is just a boolean: any non-NULL value will do */
- rev_list.data = create_full_pack ? &rev_list : NULL;
- if (start_async(&rev_list))
- die("git upload-pack: unable to fork git-rev-list");
+ if (shallow_nr) {
+ rev_list.proc = do_rev_list;
+ rev_list.data = 0;
+ if (start_async(&rev_list))
+ die("git upload-pack: unable to fork git-rev-list");
+ argv[arg++] = "pack-objects";
+ } else {
+ argv[arg++] = "pack-objects";
+ argv[arg++] = "--revs";
+ if (create_full_pack)
+ argv[arg++] = "--all";
+ else if (use_thin_pack)
+ argv[arg++] = "--thin";
+ }
- argv[arg++] = "pack-objects";
argv[arg++] = "--stdout";
if (!no_progress)
argv[arg++] = "--progress";
@@ -172,7 +179,7 @@ static void create_pack_file(void)
argv[arg++] = NULL;
memset(&pack_objects, 0, sizeof(pack_objects));
- pack_objects.in = rev_list.out; /* start_command closes it */
+ pack_objects.in = shallow_nr ? rev_list.out : -1;
pack_objects.out = -1;
pack_objects.err = -1;
pack_objects.git_cmd = 1;
@@ -181,6 +188,24 @@ static void create_pack_file(void)
if (start_command(&pack_objects))
die("git upload-pack: unable to fork git-pack-objects");
+ /* pass on revisions we (don't) want */
+ if (!shallow_nr) {
+ FILE *pipe_fd = fdopen(pack_objects.in, "w");
+ if (!create_full_pack) {
+ int i;
+ for (i = 0; i < want_obj.nr; i++)
+ fprintf(pipe_fd, "%s\n", sha1_to_hex(want_obj.objects[i].item->sha1));
+ fprintf(pipe_fd, "--not\n");
+ for (i = 0; i < have_obj.nr; i++)
+ fprintf(pipe_fd, "%s\n", sha1_to_hex(have_obj.objects[i].item->sha1));
+ }
+
+ fprintf(pipe_fd, "\n");
+ fflush(pipe_fd);
+ fclose(pipe_fd);
+ }
+
+
/* We read from pack_objects.err to capture stderr output for
* progress bar, and pack_objects.out to capture the pack data.
*/
@@ -276,7 +301,7 @@ static void create_pack_file(void)
error("git upload-pack: git-pack-objects died with error.");
goto fail;
}
- if (finish_async(&rev_list))
+ if (shallow_nr && finish_async(&rev_list))
goto fail; /* error was already reported */
/* flush the data */
@@ -451,6 +476,7 @@ static void receive_needs(void)
static char line[1000];
int len, depth = 0;
+ shallow_nr = 0;
if (debug_fd)
write_in_full(debug_fd, "#S\n", 3);
for (;;) {
@@ -534,6 +560,7 @@ static void receive_needs(void)
packet_write(1, "shallow %s",
sha1_to_hex(object->sha1));
register_shallow(object->sha1);
+ shallow_nr++;
}
result = result->next;
}
@@ -567,6 +594,8 @@ static void receive_needs(void)
for (i = 0; i < shallows.nr; i++)
register_shallow(shallows.objects[i].item->sha1);
}
+
+ shallow_nr += shallows.nr;
free(shallows.objects);
}
--
tg: (503f464..) t/revcache/upload-pack-dont-enumerate (depends on: master)
On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 10:48 PM, Nicolas Pitre<nico@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, 7 Jun 2009, Nick Edelen wrote:
>
>> how does this look?
>
> Comments below.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Nick Edelen <sirnot@xxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> ---
>> t/t5530-upload-pack-error.sh | 2 +-
>> upload-pack.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>> 2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/t/t5530-upload-pack-error.sh b/t/t5530-upload-pack-error.sh
>> index f5102b9..26bcd1e 100755
>> --- a/t/t5530-upload-pack-error.sh
>> +++ b/t/t5530-upload-pack-error.sh
>> @@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ test_expect_success 'fsck fails' '
>> test_expect_success 'upload-pack fails due to error in rev-list' '
>>
>> ! echo "0032want $(git rev-parse HEAD)
>> -00000009done
>> +0034shallow $(git rev-parse HEAD^)00000009done
>
> Why did you modify this?
>
>> 0000" | git upload-pack . > /dev/null 2> output.err &&
>> grep "waitpid (async) failed" output.err
>> '
>> diff --git a/upload-pack.c b/upload-pack.c
>> index edc7861..c8f2dca 100644
>> --- a/upload-pack.c
>> +++ b/upload-pack.c
>> @@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ static unsigned long oldest_have;
>> static int multi_ack, nr_our_refs;
>> static int use_thin_pack, use_ofs_delta, use_include_tag;
>> static int no_progress;
>> +static int shallow_nr;
>> static struct object_array have_obj;
>> static struct object_array want_obj;
>> static unsigned int timeout;
>> @@ -107,8 +108,6 @@ static int do_rev_list(int fd, void *create_full_pack)
>> struct rev_info revs;
>>
>> pack_pipe = fdopen(fd, "w");
>> - if (create_full_pack)
>> - use_thin_pack = 0; /* no point doing it */
>> init_revisions(&revs, NULL);
>> revs.tag_objects = 1;
>> revs.tree_objects = 1;
>> @@ -155,13 +154,22 @@ static void create_pack_file(void)
>> const char *argv[10];
>> int arg = 0;
>>
>> - rev_list.proc = do_rev_list;
>> - /* .data is just a boolean: any non-NULL value will do */
>> - rev_list.data = create_full_pack ? &rev_list : NULL;
>
> I'm glad you got rid of that.
>
>> - if (start_async(&rev_list))
>> - die("git upload-pack: unable to fork git-rev-list");
>> + if (shallow_nr) {
>> + rev_list.proc = do_rev_list;
>> + rev_list.data = 0;
>> + if (start_async(&rev_list))
>> + die("git upload-pack: unable to fork git-rev-list");
>> + argv[arg++] = "pack-objects";
>> + } else {
>> + argv[arg++] = "pack-objects";
>> + argv[arg++] = "--revs";
>> + argv[arg++] = "--include-tag";
>
> Why this unconditional --include-tags here? Isn't it handled already a
> couple lines down already?
>
>> + if (create_full_pack)
>> + argv[arg++] = "--all";
>> + if (use_thin_pack)
>> + argv[arg++] = "--thin";
>
> Please turn this "if (use_thin_pack)" into an "else if (use_thin_pack)"
> instead. No point using --thin for a full pack.
>
> The rest looks fine to me.
>
>
> Nicolas
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html