Matthew Clemence <matthew.clemence@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > I am working with an externally supplied code tree (some 2000 files, > which gets passed to me without any SCM) and have multiple users > working on their own individual branched versions under git > control. The problem I am facing is that there are frequenct directory > renames when the code updates which I need to find a relatively > painless way of bringing the users branches up to date. Hmmm... are you sure you are solving the correct problem? Can't you avoid directory renames, e.g. by munging position of files before entering them into SCM? > From reading > the lists and faq, there seems to be problems (and strong opinions) > with this, and I am struggling to find an effcient model to manage > this merging - either git loses track of the users changed files (and > so have to be manually merged from diff files and usually lose > history) or git loses track of everything else (and I end up manually > adding files from the new tree to get out of merge conflict). > > I would be very interested to hear if anyone has a suggestion on how > this could best be handled. Git, contrary to other version control systems such as Mercurial or Bazaar, doesn't use tracking of renames (either via recording rename event, or by using file identities / inodes), but heuristic similarity based rename _detection_. If the files are of sufficient size compared to changes, rename detection should work well and when merging changes should be applied to correct files / correct files would be renamed. Changing directory the file resides in is currently in Git just the form of changing pathname of a file, i.e. renaming of a file. Rename detection uses similarity of filename as one of factors so if basename didn't change git should correctly pair files. The problem currently is when one side renames directory, and other side creates new file in the old-name directory. Rename tracking would not help here unless SCM track also directory renames, like Bazaar reportedly does. But the problem is not impossible to overcome using rename detection like in git. There were even patches adding detection of wholesame directory renaming (factoring out directory renames out of set of detected file renames) by Yann Dirson, but they were not accepted for some reason. You migh want to either contact author, or clean up the series and send them yourself (if possibly with use cases and success stories): http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/99529 See also directory rename detection script (in Perl) in http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/81547 BTW. This issue was discussed extensively on git mailing list... -- Jakub Narebski Poland ShadeHawk on #git -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html