Wincent Colaiuta <win@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > El 20/5/2009, a las 5:35, Nicolas Pitre escribió: > > > Having a "trash" reflog would solve this unambiguously. [...] > I personally haven't been bitten by a mistaken use of "git reset" and > friends for a long time now, but I really like the ideas that have > been mentioned so far in this thread. This "trash" or "index" or > "reset" reflog would be a huge step forward in "idiot-proofing" Git. Well, having a kind of 'Attic' for reflogs for deleted branches would help here in "mistake-proofing" Git (there were even IIRC some preliminary test implementation), although it is not as necessary nowadays because of reflog for HEAD, and ability to set longer expiry time for it (IIRC). -- Jakub Narebski Poland ShadeHawk on #git -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html