On Tue, 19 May 2009, Joshua Jensen wrote: > So here's the idea: What if Git, upon a revert change (or git reset --hard > HEAD), "committed" the changes to be reverted and then did the revert with a > 'git reset --hard HEAD^'? The reverted files would be disconnected from a > branch, but they would be available in the reflog to retrieve. I think there is indeed some value in having a commit of the work directory dirty state automatically made before this state is discarded, and stuff a reference to that commit in the HEAD reflog. I think such a feature would need to be made configurable and active by default. Nicolas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html