Stephen Boyd <bebarino@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Junio C Hamano wrote: > > You are asking a wrong person. I am terrible at naming things; think > > "rerere" ;-). > > > > But I think custom-arghelp is much better than multargs. You are asking > > "use this help for argument value _literally_", so another possibility > > perhaps is PARSE_OPT_ARGHELP_LITERAL. > > > > After all, there probably are many other valid reasons why you may not > > want "s/.*/<&>/" blindly applied to your string. One reason may be > > because the string describes multiple arguments, but I suspect that it is > > not the only one. It is better to name the option after what it does, > > than naming it after one sample reason why you might want to use that > > option. > > Ok. I think PARSE_OPT_LITERAL_ARGH might be good; until someone comes up > with a better one of course. Well, 'ARGH' sounds a bit strange. I think I'd prefer ARGHELP. :-) -- Jakub Narebski Poland ShadeHawk on #git -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html