Re: [PATCH 2/3] parse-options: add PARSE_OPT_CUSTOM_ARGH for complicated argh's

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Junio C Hamano wrote:
> You are asking a wrong person.  I am terrible at naming things; think
> "rerere" ;-).
>
> But I think custom-arghelp is much better than multargs.  You are asking
> "use this help for argument value _literally_", so another possibility
> perhaps is PARSE_OPT_ARGHELP_LITERAL.
>
> After all, there probably are many other valid reasons why you may not
> want "s/.*/<&>/" blindly applied to your string.  One reason may be
> because the string describes multiple arguments, but I suspect that it is
> not the only one.  It is better to name the option after what it does,
> than naming it after one sample reason why you might want to use that
> option.

Ok. I think PARSE_OPT_LITERAL_ARGH might be good; until someone comes up
with a better one of course.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]