Re: [PATCH 2/2] Windows: Skip fstat/lstat optimization in write_entry()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2009/4/20 Johannes Sixt <j.sixt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> Alex Riesen schrieb:
>> 2009/4/20 Dmitry Potapov <dpotapov@xxxxxxxxx>:
>>> If the time passed between the creating file and end of writing to it is
>>> small (less than timestamp resolution), you may not notice the problem.
>>> The following program demonstrates the problem with fstat on Windows.
>>> (I compiled it using Cygwin). If you remove 'sleep' then you may not
>>> notice the problem for a long time.
>>
>> And the Windows being as slow as it is, the problem can stay undetected for
>> a long time in a real working code.
>
> You got that wrong: If Windows were slow, the error would have been
> triggered more often and it would have been detected earlier. There you
> have the proof: Windows is fast ... enough :-P

Err, yes. Still a piece of cpp junk
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]