2009/4/20 Dmitry Potapov <dpotapov@xxxxxxxxx>: > The cygwin version has the same problem. (In fact, it is even worse, > because we have an optimized version for lstat/stat but not for fstat, > and they return different values for some fields like i_no). But even > if we used the only Cygwin functions, we would still face the problem, > because Windows returns the wrong values for timestamps (and maybe > even size on FAT?). So I think the following patch should be squashed > on top. I just sent a patch with an "optimized" fstat. I see no problems (at least none like these) with that patch. Timestamps match. Windows XP, yes. But since that MSDN article mentions that it is not guaranteed, I guess I just been lucky. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html