Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 11:25:08AM +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > >> > This feels very hack-ish to me, but perhaps this is a case of "perfect >> > is the enemy of the good". >> >> I have a strong feeling that none of our diff/rev options can sanely take >> a parameter looking like "--defaults" or "--no-defaults". >> >> But I do not have the time to audit the options. Maybe you have? > > Right now, I think we are safe. A few options like "--default" do take a > separated string argument, but saying "--default --no-defaults" seems a > little crazy to me (besides being confusing because they are talking > about two totally unrelated defaults). Maybe you guys have already considered and discarded this as too hacky, but isn't it the easiest to explain and code to declare --no-defaults is acceptable only at the beginning? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html