Re: [PATCH 1/3] git remote update: Report error for non-existing groups

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 01:20:36AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> I don't know what users want to see when they say "default" explicitly
>> without having an explicit configuration.  Should it do the same thing as
>> "git remote update"?
>
> I'm not sure we have a choice anymore; is it worth breaking
> compatibility to "fix" something that doesn't actually seem to be
> harming anyone?

Nope.  I do not use the "remote update" myself to begin with, and I
somehow suspect that the reason it does not seem to be harming anyone is
because nobody sane uses these "remote groups".

Anyway, I took the patch as-is already.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]