Re: Performance issue: initial git clone causes massive repack

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 12:59 AM, Nicolas Sebrecht
<nicolas.s-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> What about the rsync solution given in this thread?

Also, HTTP is excellent for initial clones, possibly better than rsync
in some cases.

The Gentoo team has good reasons to do things their way, and it's IMHO
a wart in git that initial clones of large repos. But we do have valid
workarounds (as above) so they can use them .

cheers,



martin
-- 
 martin.langhoff@xxxxxxxxx
 martin@xxxxxxxxxx -- School Server Architect
 - ask interesting questions
 - don't get distracted with shiny stuff  - working code first
 - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]