Re: [RFC/PATCH 0/2] New 'stage' command

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 10:25 PM, Björn Steinbrink <B.Steinbrink@xxxxxx> wrote:
> On 2009.04.06 22:13:26 +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 9:30 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > David Kågedal <davidk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> >
>> >> What do you mean? This was a suggestion for how git diff should
>> >> work. I fail to see how you would need a WORKTREEANDTHEINDEX there.
>> >
>> > You are talking only about "git diff".  I am talking about the whole git
>> > suite, because you have to worry about how such a proposal would affect
>> > other parts of the UI.
>>
>> How do currently do you something like this:
>> git diff HEAD^..STAGE
>
> git diff --cached HEAD^
>
> The "hard" (and pretty weird) one would be "git diff STAGE..HEAD^",
> which is:
>
> git diff -R --cached HEAD^

Sorry, that's what I meant.

So it's possible, but completely unintuitive, and different from other
use cases.

-- 
Felipe Contreras
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]