Re: Performance issue: initial git clone causes massive repack

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 5 Apr 2009, Sverre Rabbelier wrote:

> Heya,
> 
> On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 23:28,  <david@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Guys, back off a little on telling the gentoo people to change.
> 
> I agree here, we should either say "look, we don't really support big
> repositories because [explanation here], unless you [workarounds
> here]" OR we should work to improve the support we do have. Of course,
> the latter option does not magically create developer time to work on
> that, but if we do go that way we should at least tell people that we
> are aware of the problems and that it's on the global TODO list (not
> necessarily on anyone's personal TODO list though).

For the record... I at least am aware of the problem and it is indeed on 
my personal git todo list.  Not that I have a clear solution yet (I've 
been pondering on some git packing issues for almost 4 years now).

Still, in this particular case, the problem appears to be unclear to me, 
like "this shouldn't be so bad".

> Of course, the problem can sometimes be solved by splitting the
> repository, but I think it is important to have an official policy
> here, do we want Git to support huge repositories, or do we not?

I do.


Nicolas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]