2006/9/5, Junio C Hamano <junkio@xxxxxxx>:
Rene Scharfe <rene.scharfe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Junio C Hamano schrieb:
>...
> Well, this is just _one_ of the positions I've taken on this topic, I
> have to admit. Franck then convinced me that merging downloader and
> archiver into one command is nice for users (less commands to remember,
> keeps existing --remote option) even if it doesn't make sense
> technically, because their implementations have nothing in common.
Ah, I was not following the thread closely and I agree with you
and Franck now in that smaller number of commands the better.
(IOW, download-archive in my 3-item list is not needed in the
end user UI and can be implemented as "git-archive-tree
--remote=<repo>).
OK, I'm sending what I've been able to do so far. It has been done
before you sent some feedbacks one day ago, so please forgive me if,
for the moment, I called "git-archive" instead of "git-archive-tree"
or if I missed some of your points; I'll change that.
I'm sending 2 patches, which are sent to get some comments. They're
not for inclusion in anyways.
The pathspec area has been pick up from Rene's initial patch. I have
not enough git's internal knowledge to improve it. But I'll be glad to
look at this later (if you have any clues for starting point BTW).
--
Franck
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html