Re: [PATCH][RFC] Add git-archive-tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2006/9/2, Rene Scharfe <rene.scharfe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
The two patches I sent are what I have been able to come up with so far.
The next step would be to add archive-neutral upload and download support.

Having thought a bit about it I propose to keep git-archive-tree for
local operations, only.  It can be called by the uploader just like

Well I don't see why putting the remote operations in an other file. I
was more thinking on something like this:

git-archive --format=<fmt> [--remote=<repo>] <tree-ish> [path...]

This main porcelain function would call directly functions provided by
archivers lib. We will need to define an API which git-archive will
use for local operations.

Symetrically, on the sever side we would have:

git-upload-archive --format=<fmt> <repo> [path...]

used by git-daemon. It will deal with protocol, paths and use archiver's lib.

Eventually, we would have 2 commands:

git-archive
git-upload-archive

and get ride of

git-tar-tree
git-zip-tree
git-upload-tar
git-upload-zip

git-tar-tree is now called by git-upload-tar.  As Franck suggested, the
uploader should allow the list of archive formats it supports to be
restricted in a config file.  The range of allowed compression levels
should also be configurable.

Does it make sense to change the wire protocol to simply send the
command line options one by one?

That would make sense if the number of options grow up. Currently the
remote protocol had been written by Junio, I just pick up that part
from git-tar-tree and put it into git-archive. But if we allow
pathspec for remote operations, then  we need to send them to the
uploader.


The interface could be something like this:

   git-download-archive <repo> <git-archive-tree options...>
   git-upload-archive <directory>

Or, if the big number of git command names is a concern:


I think it is, IMHO. And that's why I think we could have only one
command for building localy/remotely archive whatever the format.
git-archive should be a main procelain command, and we should get rid
of git-{tar,zip}-tree commands.

--
              Franck

--
VGER BF report: U 0.742177
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]