Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxx> writes: > On Fri, 1 Sep 2006, Jonas Fonseca wrote: >> Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxx> wrote Thu, Aug 31, 2006: >> > >> > Umm? You should get a "usage" error, no? >> >> Yes, ok, they do not seem to make sense for git-rev-list, however if you >> pass either to git-log, the output seems to make room for a diff, adding >> one extra newline, but without appending any diff. > > Ahh. I think that a "-r" without any other request for patches (or > "--name-status" or similar) should probably imply "--raw". At least that > was how it historically worked.. > > Anyway, _if_ it ever worked (and I think it did, but I'm way too lazy to > bother checking), this may have been broken by the extensive diff option > cleanups by Timo in June. Timo? Junio? I think it did too. I am kind of surprised that nobody noticed and t4013 test (which was done specifically to catch potential behaviour change by Timo's patch) did not check for this particular case. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html