Re: [PATCH] git-rev-list(1): group options; reformat; document more options

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Fri, 1 Sep 2006, Jonas Fonseca wrote:
> Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxx> wrote Thu, Aug 31, 2006:
> > 
> > Umm? You should get a "usage" error, no?
> 
> Yes, ok, they do not seem to make sense for git-rev-list, however if you
> pass either to git-log, the output seems to make room for a diff, adding
> one extra newline, but without appending any diff.

Ahh. I think that a "-r" without any other request for patches (or 
"--name-status" or similar) should probably imply "--raw". At least that 
was how it historically worked..

Anyway, _if_ it ever worked (and I think it did, but I'm way too lazy to 
bother checking), this may have been broken by the extensive diff option 
cleanups by Timo in June. Timo? Junio?

			Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]