Re: [RFC+PATCH 1/1] Move SCM interoperability tools into scm/

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Ryan Anderson <ryan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>   
>> Comments on a way to make the Makefile less repetitive would be
>> appreciated, though.
>>     
>
> One obvious way would be not to have scm/Makefile but have the
> dependencies in the main Makefile to say (the moral equivalent
> of):
>
> 	git-archimport.perl: scm/git-archimport.perl
>   
I think that doing that means I still need to duplicate the  actual
build rules, which is what I was hoping to avoid, as they encode all the
magic "path replacement" logic in multiple places.

On the other hand, I can fix *that*, if I break the ability to run in
the build directory, which is bad in its own way.  (Fixing the tests
should be a matter of adapting the test library slightly, I think.)

For the time being, I'm going with ugly, but less disruptive, and I'm
willing/planning on revisiting it when things shake out a bit more.


-- 

Ryan Anderson
  sometimes Pug Majere


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]