Timo Hirvonen wrote: > Petr Baudis <pasky@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > >> I've been meaning to do something like this for some time already; my >> itch have been the builtins. The tree size _is_ getting out of hand and >> a little more categorization of the sources would certainly help. >> Although I'd take a different approach: >> >> libgit/ >> builtin/ >> standalone/ >> scripts/ >> > > Please don't. One directory is much easier to work with. At least > don't split the Makefile. Also moving files makes "git log <file>" > stop at the rename. > By "don't split the Makefile", do mean, "Don't use recursive make"? I'm fine with that (and if you look at my patch, I "include scm/Makefile" to do just that), but if you mean "keep only a top-level Makefile", well, I think that continues the problem of "there is too much stuff going on here", but I can be persuaded otherwise. -- Ryan Anderson sometimes Pug Majere
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature