Re: [PATCH] Additional merge-base tests

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes:

> If that should be not true, you always could rely on topo order. Which 
> does not seem to solve the problem for you.

The computation of merge-base is about computing topo order
cheaply, so that is a recursive definition of the problem, not a
solution, I am afraid.  

With the generation counter, we know the clean-up phase needs to
parse and traverse unparsed parents with the same or higher
generation counter than the lowest we have in the result list,
which would limit our clean-up traversal.  In order to look at
the generation number of parent, we would need to parse it, so
we would end up parsing one level more than needed at the edge,
though.


-
: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]