Re: [POOL] Who likes running Git without make install?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Petr Baudis <pasky@xxxxxxx> writes:

> Dear diary, on Sun, Jul 02, 2006 at 02:05:46AM CEST, I got a letter
> where Junio C Hamano <junkio@xxxxxxx> said that...
>> That's fixed in ancient past in git timescale.  Why are you
>> bringing it up again? ;-)
>
> Because, it is, well, not fixed? ;-) (Apparently.)

That response is about "Worse yet, the order is wrong -- ah you
are right" exchange, not about in-place execution.

>> Well, for a quick test to see if I haven't broken anything, I
>> use a new shell and do ". ./+denv" in my git repository where
>> that file has something like this:
>> 
>>         $ cat ./+denv
>>         :
>> 
>>         GIT_EXEC_PATH=`pwd`
>>         PATH=`pwd`:/usr/bin:/bin
>> 
>>         export GIT_EXEC_PATH PATH
>> 
>> So to a certain degree, yes I do care.
>
> But it is currently broken:

I know.  The scriptlet needs to muck with PERL5LIB too.

-
: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]