Re: [POOL] Who likes running Git without make install?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Petr Baudis <pasky@xxxxxxx> writes:

> Dear diary, on Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 08:48:31AM CEST, I got a letter
> where Junio C Hamano <junkio@xxxxxxx> said that...
>> I remember myself getting utterly discusted when I saw the
>> inclusion of the build-time blib directory in the search path in
>> some other Perl code outside git.
>
> Well, yes, it is ugly, but it was really cool that we could have used
> Git without installing it anywhere.
>
> But perhaps that's just me refusing to break his old ways of doing
> things. Does anyone else care about it? (And why?)
>
>> Worse yet, I suspect the order you do the two directories is
>> wrong to prefer the freshly built one over the one you installed
>> the last time, but I was trying not to stare at too much for
>> health reasons so ... ;-).
>
> Oh man, of course you are right. :-)

That's fixed in ancient past in git timescale.  Why are you
bringing it up again? ;-)

-
: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]