On Sat, 24 Jun 2006, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > If somebody has time and inclination, please try updated PPC SHA-1 > from linux@xxxxxxxxxxx that is in "pu" (say make check-sha1) and > report impressions. "make check-sha1" passes. Before: [torvalds@g5 linux]$ /usr/bin/time git-fsck-objects --full 101.90user 4.66system 1:46.72elapsed 99%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k 0inputs+0outputs (0major+1787158minor)pagefaults 0swaps After: [torvalds@g5 linux]$ /usr/bin/time ~/git/git-fsck-objects --full 101.16user 4.32system 1:45.56elapsed 99%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k 0inputs+0outputs (0major+1787127minor)pagefaults 0swaps which doesn't seem to really imply anything seriously changed (in fact, rerunning it made the numbers even closer). This is on a G5 powerpc. Also, "pu" in general is totally unusable. It doesn't even compile. I think that "Git.xs" thing is fine for random hacks, but please please PLEASE don't make any central program depend on it. Linus - : send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html