Re: packs and trees

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 6/21/06, Nicolas Pitre <nico@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, 20 Jun 2006, Martin Langhoff wrote:

> On 6/20/06, Jon Smirl <jonsmirl@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > The plan is to modify rcs2git from parsecvs to create all of the git
> > objects for the tree.
>
> Sounds like a good plan. Have you seen recent discussions about it
> being impossible to repack usefully when you don't have trees (and
> resulting performance problems on ext3).

What do you mean?

I was thinking of the "repacking disconnected objects" thread, but now
I see it did have a solution in listing all the objects and paths. I
take that back.

If you are asking about the ext3 performance problems, I think Linus
discussed that a while ago, why unpacked repos are slow (in addition
to huge), and there were some suggestions of using hashed directory
indexes.

cheers,


martin
-
: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]